FACTS: ING Bank,
"the Philippine branch of Internationale Nederlanden Bank N.V., a foreign
banking corporation incorporated in the Netherlands, is duly authorized by the
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas to operate as a branch with full banking authority
in the Philippines."
Petitioner ING Bank asserts that it is "qualified to
avail of the tax amnesty under Section 5 [of Republic Act No. 9480] and not
disqualified under Section 8 [of the same law]."
Furthermore, Petitioner ING Bank claims that it is not
liable for withholding taxes on bonuses accruing to its officers and employees
during taxable years 1996 and 1997. It maintains its position that the
liability of the employer to withhold the tax does not arise until such bonus
is actually distributed. Petitioner ING Bank further argues that the Court of
Tax Appeals' discussion on Section 29(j) of the 1993 National Internal Revenue
Code and Section 3 of Revenue Regulations No. 8-90 is not applicable because
the issue in this case.
In petitioner's case, bonuses were determined during the
year (1996 and 1997) but were distributed in the succeeding year. No
withholding of income tax was effected but the bonuses were claimed as an
expense for the year. Since the bonuses were not subjected to withholding tax
during the year they were claimed as an expense, the same should be
disallowed.
ISSUES: 1.
Whether petitioner ING Bank may validly avail itself of the tax amnesty granted
by Republic Act No. 9480;
2. Whether petitioner ING Bank is liable for deficiency
withholding tax on accrued bonuses for the taxable years 1996 and 1997.
HELD: 1. Yes.
Qualified taxpayers with pending tax cases may still avail themselves of the
tax amnesty program. Thus, the provision in BIR Revenue Memorandum Circular No.
19-2008 excepting "issues and cases which were ruled by any court (even
without finality) in favor of the BIR prior to amnesty availment of the
taxpayer" from the benefits of the law is illegal, invalid, and null and
void. The duty to withhold the tax on compensation arises upon its
accrual.
2. Yes. We hold that the obligation of the payor/employer
to deduct and withhold the related withholding tax arises at the time the
income was paid or accrued or recorded as an expense in the payor's/employer's
books, whichever comes first.
Petitioner ING Bank accrued or recorded the bonuses as
deductible expense in its books. Therefore, its obligation to withhold the
related withholding tax due from the deductions for accrued bonuses arose at
the time of accrual and not at the time of actual payment.
Comments
Post a Comment